Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000
Deaths Every Year
By
Dr. Joseph Mercola
This article in the Journal of
the American Medical Association (JAMA) is the best article I
have ever seen written in the published literature documenting
the tragedy of the traditional medical paradigm.
If you want to keep updated on
issues like this click
here to sign up for my free newsletter.
This information is a followup
of the Institute
of Medicine report which hit the papers in December of last
year, but the data was hard to reference as it was not in peer-reviewed
journal. Now it is published in JAMA which is the most widely
circulated medical periodical in the world.
The author is Dr. Barbara Starfield
of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and
she desribes how the US health care system may contribute to
poor health.
ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:
- 12,000 -----unnecessary surgery 8
- 7,000 -----medication errors in hospitals 9
- 20,000 ----other errors in hospitals 10
- 80,000 ----infections in hospitals 10
- 106,000 ---non-error, negative
effects of drugs 2
These total to 250,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes!!
What does the word iatrogenic
mean? This term is defined as induced in a patient by a physician's
activity, manner, or therapy. Used especially of a complication
of treatment.
Dr. Starfield offers several
warnings in interpreting these numbers:
- First, most of the data are derived from studies
in hospitalized patients.
- Second, these estimates are for deaths only
and do not include negative effects that are associated with
disability or discomfort.
- Third, the estimates of death due to error
are lower than those in the IOM report.1
If the higher estimates are used,
the deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000
to 284,000. In any case, 225,000 deaths per year constitutes
the third leading cause of death in the United States, after
deaths from heart disease and cancer. Even if these figures are
overestimated, there is a wide margin between these numbers of
deaths and the next leading cause of death (cerebrovascular disease).
Another analysis 11 concluded that between 4% and 18% of consecutive patients
experience negative effects in outpatient settings,with:
- 116 million extra physician visits
- 77 million extra prescriptions
- 17 million emergency department visits
- 8 million hospitalizations
- 3 million long-term admissions
- 199,000 additional deaths
- $77 billion in extra costs
The high cost of the health care
system is considered to be a deficit, but seems to be tolerated
under the assumption that better health results from more expensive
care.
However, evidence from a few
studies indicates that as many as 20% to 30% of patients receive
inappropriate care.
An estimated 44,000 to 98,000
among them die each year as a result of medical errors.2
This might be tolerated if it
resulted in better health, but does it? Of 13 countries in a
recent comparison,3,4 the
United States ranks an average of 12th (second from the bottom)
for 16 available health indicators. More specifically, the ranking
of the US on several indicators was:
- 13th (last) for low-birth-weight percentages
- 13th for neonatal mortality and infant mortality
overall 14
- 11th for postneonatal mortality
- 13th for years of potential life lost (excluding
external causes)
- 11th for life expectancy at 1 year for females,
12th for males
- 10th for life expectancy at 15 years for females,
12th for males
- 10th for life expectancy at 40 years for females,
9th for males
- 7th for life expectancy at 65 years for females,
7th for males
- 3rd for life expectancy at 80 years for females,
3rd for males
- 10th for age-adjusted mortality
The poor performance of the US
was recently confirmed by a World Health Organization study,
which used different data and ranked the United States as 15th
among 25 industrialized countries.
There is a perception that the
American public "behaves badly" by smoking, drinking, and perpetrating
violence." However the data does not support this assertion.
·
The proportion of females who
smoke ranges from 14% in Japan to 41% in Denmark; in the United
States, it is 24% (fifth best). For males, the range is from 26%
in Sweden to 61% in Japan; it is 28% in the United States (third
best).
·
The US ranks fifth best for alcoholic
beverage consumption.
- The US has relatively low consumption of animal
fats (fifth lowest in men aged 55-64 years in 20 industrialized
countries) and the third lowest mean cholesterol concentrations
among men aged 50 to 70 years among 13 industrialized countries.
These estimates of death due
to error are lower than those in a recent Institutes of Medicine
report, and if the higher estimates are used, the deaths due
to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000.
Even at the lower estimate of
225,000 deaths per year, this constitutes the third leading cause
of death in the US, following heart disease and cancer.
Lack of technology is certainly
not a contributing factor to the US's low ranking.
- Among 29 countries, the United States is second
only to Japan in the availability of magnetic resonance imaging
units and computed tomography scanners per million population.
17
- Japan, however, ranks highest on health, whereas
the US ranks among the lowest.
- It is possible that the high use of technology
in Japan is limited to diagnostic technology not matched by
high rates of treatment, whereas in the US, high use of diagnostic
technology may be linked to more treatment.
- Supporting this possibility are data showing
that the number of employees per bed (full-time equivalents)
in the United States is highest among the countries ranked,
whereas they are very low in Japan, far lower than can be accounted
for by the common practice of having family members rather
than hospital staff provide the amenities of hospital care.
Journal American
Medical Association Vol 284 July 26, 2000
COMMENT: Folks, this is what
they call a "Landmark Article". Only several ones like this
are published every year. One of the major reasons it is so
huge as that it is published in JAMA which is the largest and
one of the most respected medical journals in the entire world.
I did find it most curious that the best wire service in the
world, Reuter's, did not pick up this article. I have no idea
why they let it slip by.
I would encourage you to bookmark
this article and review it several times so you can use the
statistics to counter the arguments of your friends and relatives
who are so enthralled with the traditional medical paradigm.
These statistics prove very clearly that the system is just
not working. It is broken and is in desperate need of repair.
I was previously fond of saying
that drugs are the fourth leading cause of death in this country.
However, this article makes it quite clear that the more powerful
number is that doctors are the third leading cause of death
in this country killing nearly a quarter million people a year.
The only more common causes are cancer and heart disease. This
statistic is likely to be seriously underestimated as much
of the coding only describes the cause of organ failure and
does not address iatrogenic causes at all.
Japan seems to have benefited
from recognizing that technology is wonderful, but just because
you diagnose something with it, one should not be committed
to undergoing treatment in the traditional paradigm. Their
health statistics reflect this aspect of their philosophy as
much of their treatment is not treatment at all, but loving
care rendered in the home.
Care, not treatment, is the
answer. Drugs, surgery and hospitals are rarely the answer
to chronic health problems. Facilitating the God-given healing
capacity that all of us have is the key. Improving the diet,
exercise, and lifestyle are basic. Effective interventions
for the underlying emotional and spiritual wounding behind
most chronic illness are also important clues to maximizing
health and reducing disease.
Related Articles:
Medical
Mistakes Kill 100,000 per year
US Health
Care System Most Expensive in the World
Drug
Induced Disorders
Author/Article Information
Author Affiliation: Department
of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene
and Public Health, Baltimore, Md. Corresponding Author and Reprints:
Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, Department of Health Policy and Management,
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, 624 N Broadway,
Room 452, Baltimore, MD 21205-1996 (e-mail: bstarfie@jhsph.edu).
REFERENCES
1. Schuster
M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the quality of health care
in the United States?
Milbank
Q. 1998;76:517-563.
2. Kohn L, ed, Corrigan J, ed, Donaldson M, ed. To Err Is Human: Building
a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
3. Starfield
B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
4. World Health
Report 2000. Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htm Accessed June
28, 2000.
5. Kunst A.
Cross-national Comparisons of Socioeconomic Differences in Mortality.
Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University; 1997.
6. Law M, Wald
N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the time lag
explanation. BMJ. 1999;313:1471-1480.
7. Starfield
B. Evaluating the State Children's Health Insurance Program:
critical considerations.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:569-585.
8. Leape L.Unecessarsary
surgery. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:363-383.
9. Phillips D, Christenfeld N, Glynn L. Increase in US medication-error
deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet. 1998;351:643-644.
10. Lazarou
J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in
hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205.
11. Weingart
SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology and medical
error. BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.
12. Wilkinson R. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality.
London, England: Routledge; 1996.
13. Evans R,
Roos N. What is right about the Canadian health system? Milbank Q. 1999;77:393-399.
14. Guyer B, Hoyert D, Martin J, Ventura S, MacDorman M, Strobino D.
Annual summary of vital statistics1998. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1229-1246.
15. Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care, and
outcomes of care for generalists and specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:499-511.
16. Donahoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies,
deficiencies, and excesses. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1596-1607.
17. Anderson
G, Poullier J-P. Health Spending, Access, and Outcomes: Trends
in Industrialized Countries. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund;
1999.
18. Mold J,
Stein H. The cascade effect in the clinical care of patients. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:512-514.
19. Shi L, Starfield B. Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators. J Fam Pract.
1999;48:275-284.
Dr, Joseph Mercola directs the Optimal Wellness
Center. His weekly newsletter in which this was published is available
from: http://www.mercola.com/.
|