| 
Justice Dept. Says It Intended To Shield Anthrax Probe Figure
By Guy Gugliotta
and Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, December 13, 2002; Page A22
The Justice Department
says it did not intend to focus attention on former Army scientist
Steven Hatfill by describing him as a "person of interest" in
last year's anthrax attacks, and in fact sought to shield him
from unwarranted public scrutiny, according to department documents
released yesterday.
The department
did, however, defend its right to have Hatfill fired from his
job training first responders in a biodefense program the agency
funds at Louisiana State University, saying it was exercising "managerial
oversight and control."
The department's
positions were outlined in two letters sent to Sen. Charles E.
Grassley (R-Iowa), in response to queries he submitted after
the LSU firing and after the FBI had three times searched Hatfill's
apartment in Frederick. The letters, dated Oct. 18 and Nov. 4,
were posted on Grassley's Web site yesterday.
Release of the
letters apparently had nothing to do with an ongoing FBI search
in the Frederick Municipal Forest area. Law enforcement sources
said agents were responding to a tip from someone who had spoken
to Hatfill hypothetically about biological weapons. One law enforcement
source called the expedition "a shot in the dark."
"The FBI can
search the planet until hell freezes over, but it will find that
Steve Hatfill was never involved in the anthrax attacks," said
Hatfill spokesman Pat Clawson. Hatfill was aware of the search,
Clawson added, but was "utterly clueless about it."
The Frederick
Municipal Forest is a wooded area about four miles northwest
of Frederick and Fort Detrick, the Army's principal biodefense
lab. It is adjacent to the Catoctin National Park, which contains
the presidential retreat at Camp David.
Fort Detrick
has been a focal point in the investigation of the mail-borne
anthrax attacks that killed five people last year. Hatfill, 48,
worked there from 1997 to 1999 as a virus specialist and lived
in an apartment practically next door.
FBI investigators
searched the apartment in June with his consent, then again in
August with a federal warrant. A few days later the Justice Department
effectively asked LSU to fire him. Immediately after that, the
FBI searched the apartment a third time.
Throughout the
investigation, law enforcement sources, and eventually Attorney
General John D. Ashcroft, repeatedly denied that Hatfill was
a suspect, identifying him instead as a "person of interest."
The official
attention and the firing, however, prompted a barrage of publicity
and news reports digging deep into Hatfill's background and eventually
causing him to say publicly that "my life is being destroyed
by arrogant government bureaucrats."
Grassley wrote
Ashcroft on Sept. 18, asking for an explanation of the firing
and for a definition of "person of interest." In a statement
yesterday, Grassley said he appreciated the department's replies.
"I also appreciate
the department's candidness that the action regarding Mr. Hatfill
and his employment is unprecedented," Grassley said, and that "there
is no . . . formal definition for the term 'person of interest.' "
Assistant Attorney
General Daniel J. Bryant said in a letter to Grassley that the
department meant no harm in describing Hatfill as a "person of
interest." Instead, the phrase was used "to deflect media scrutiny" and "explain
that he [Hatfill] was just one of many scientists" who had cooperated
with the FBI.
In a separate
letter about the LSU firing, Bryant told Grassley that as principal
funding source for the university's National Center for Biomedical
Research, the department was entitled to "substantial involvement" in "the
selection of key personnel." The letter did not say why Hatfill
was fired.
Hatfill spokesman
Clawson dismissed the department responses as "further proof
that John Ashcroft's Justice Department is accountable to no
one. It makes up the rules as it goes along. That's kangaroo
court kind of stuff."
Staff writer
David Snyder contributed to this report.
© 2002 The Washington
Post Company
|