From: A Naval Officer
To: tetra@tetrahedron.org
Subject: anthrax vaccine
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 


Dr. horowitz;

My name is . I am in the United States Navy, and I am currently forward deployed in the 5th fleet. I am being told that I am required to take this vaccination for the good of my future, however I as I like to be the informed person that I am have taken it upon my self to investigate this vaccine. I came up with your Web page and took a look through it and found to my liking I must admit that this Vaccination is rather harmful.

I have made the decision not to take this shot. I have been basically told that #1 My military career has to come to an end and that I will get burned for not agreeing To taking this shot that they preach as the final word in the battle against anthrax.

My question that I have is this: Do I have the option of any type of retribution That I can get from the government for them making me leave the navy for not taking the Shot ? Also if not is there any other good informative places on the internet that  I can refer to in order to gain more information concerning this vaccine?

P.S. I am a ___________ in the Navy and I have a top secret security clearance from The government, and yet they want to kick me out for not getting a shot.

Makes a lot Of sense doesn't it?

Also you can reach me at 

I would appreciate a response Please.

Sincerely,

Reply:

Dear _____________,

Your story and case is compelling. I'd like to help. You'll have to do the vast majority of homework. To begin, I'm going to give you a few attorneys to contact who may or may not be of assistance. Try to reach them, tell them you're working with  me, explain your case, and ask them if they would help. Your case could be, I believe, landmark and they may want in on the action. 

Ms. Jennifer Sodaro
Attorney at Law
2 MidAmerica Plaza Ste 800
Oakbrook Terrace IL 60181
708-974-3232
630-416-6993
JSODARO@aol.com


Next call:
Tod Nielson, Attorney at Law
816-421-2050

Next try:
Mr. Walter Kyle, J.D.
Attorney at Law
Sixty South Street
Hingham, MA 02043
781-741-5166

Walter is often hard to reach, but is very knowledgeable 
re: vaccine contamination issues and injury lawsuits. 

As a last resort call
Dr. Nancy Lord, MD, Attorney at Law Nancy Lord-Attorney 
500 N. Rainbow Blvd. Suite 300
Las Vegas NV 89107
1-500-4-DRLORD
defense@mindspring.com

I believe if the case proceeds, the military may want to settle. The government and pharmaceutical industry will never want the dirt revealed regarding vaccine contaminations and injury risks. That's also a very important reason to pursue your case. In addition, regarding the anthrax vaccine, here are some concerns: The vaccine has not been adequately tested long term. Therefore, it has not been proven to be safe.

It is also a relatively weak vaccine. It requires a lengthy series of six doses over a period of time to allegedly infer immunity. Moreover, the series must be redone periodically to maintain immunity. Meantime, each time the vaccine is injected, additional risks accrue.

Finally, and most importantly, the anthrax vaccine is most likely to be ineffective against a bioterrorist attack, or biological warfare exposure. This is because virtually all biological weapons developers have developed strains of anthrax against which the vaccine is impotent. 

So why would the Pentagon, after years of refusing to vaccinate military personnel with the anthrax vaccine suddenly change course and require this risky and largely ineffective vaccine to be given? It is obvious that Pentagon officials did not want to admit that contaminated vaccines most plausibly initiated most of the cases of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS). The CIA heavily implicated the Pentagon in a cover-up concerning GWS; they also attempted to sidestep the issue of both  experimental AIDS vaccines and contaminated vaccines that were given to the troops.

In the 3-hour video expose' entitled "Gulf War Syndrome: The Spreading Epidemic Coverup" (published by Tetrahedron, LLC, 1-888-508-4787), Gen. Norman Schwartzkopf and Colin Powell are shown falsely testifying before Congress. They alleged the troops were given the option to refuse the vaccines that, in fact, were forced upon them. General Schwartzkopf also falsely testified when he denied knowledge that troops were exposed to American made biological and chemical weapons during the war. These weapons, the videotape shows, had been shipped to Saddam Hussein from Oklahoma City, OK.

Thus, Pentagon officials knew before the war that our troops would likely be exposed to U.S. made biological and chemical weapons, yet, sent them to the Gulf largely unprepared.

Why might the highest ranking Pentagon officials knowingly do this? A lengthy and politically complicated evaluation simply indicates the U. S. military is being intentionally compromised at this time. Indicators include: the unprecedented defunding, defanging, and demoralizing of U. S. military forces. Demoralizing factors include the Commander-in-Chief's  publicized sexual exploits, and the recently broadcast controversies surrounding homosexuals, women, sexism, and racism in the U. S. military.

Given that U.S. service men and women have been largely composed of nationalistic patriotic individuals inclined to support American sovereignty, could such massive military presence represent a risk to globalist undertakings? 

Undoubtedly. Particularly at a time when international political and military--industrial efforts are underway to strengthen U.N. "Peacekeeping" and NATO alliance forces. This juxtaposition and transfer of power might best explain the Pentagon's irrational actions concerning the administration of obviously risky and deadly vaccines to uninformed and unconsenting troops. It makes sense of the extreme risk being posed today to 2.4 million military personnel targeted to receive the anthrax vaccine.

At additional risk are these service men and women's families, given the infectious nature of some vaccine contaminants (such as mycoplasma with GWS), and to the nation as a whole.

The fall of international economic and political boundaries foreshadows a similar dissolution of nations into "nation-states" that serve, as President Bill Clinton recently stated, a "New World Economic Order." 

One imperative upon which this New World Order of nation-states and global governance is based is "population control." Obviously, smaller populations, and weaker nations, are more easily controlled. With regard to the United States, a fifty-percent American depopulation effort has been established, activated, and publicized in the March--April, 1996 issue of "Foreign Affairs," the most esteemed political periodical published by the political and financial elite Council of Foreign Relations (CFR).

Given the above, it is only reasonable to speculate the administration of the anthrax vaccine to U.S. military personnel, at this critical time in world history, may be the "straw that break's the camel's back" for America as a sovereign nation.

Written by:

Leonard G. Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH.
Tetrahedron, LLC
P. O. Box 2033
Sandpoint, ID 83864
208-265-2575
e-mail: tetra@tetrahedron.org
website: http://www.tetrahedron.org/



To order Dr. Horowitz's books and tapes on this and other related subjects, visit our online store.